I go out of a forum of art and I return disappointed, destabilized there....
Many prejudices on the abstract art...
What proves that the art is badly understood , worse, a lack of interest, questionings... It is inequitable to say that certain artists realize works abstracted in a purpose to pécunnier... And I have difficulty in understanding certain persons when they think that the abstraction helps to make some fast made money???
It have no rules, nor no tendencies, no effects of mode there on the very profitable category of painting...
For example on the market of the art the works of Klimt or Ingres thus of the "representational ", " academic"painting is sold at a high price and very quickly.. There are no rules... it seems to me?
You should not say that the abstraction is a history of ease, saving of time, money, it is certainly deeper, more powerful than a simple question of money...
It saddens me that certain persons think that the art abstracts or the embodiment of the "evil", or considered as "nobody", " without interest " and what the said painting "representational artist" who seems to calm the spirits shows to be the embodiment of the "Beautiful" of " licked well ", the "Good".....
Quite typical of paintings has his message to be delivered, happy the one who discovers it in ........
Leave the painting you speak ...................... because the “painting is the writing of the heart ".
Sand.